Post by Deagle Financial ServicesPost by DrummerI used to enjoy going to MSN chatrooms and meeting people worldwide and
talking to many different people. Now they are charging $29.95 US funds for
the privilege of Free Speech.
Though I applaud there efforts in cutting down pedophile usage, there are
many people who can not afford to pay multi-millionaire Bill Gates $29.95 US
to simply chat to others.
I suspect that MSN is less concerned about pedophiles than they are in turning
what was an unprofitable part of their operation into a cash cow. From what
I've read, MSN will offer their subscription chat service in North America and
(go figure) Brazil. The rest of the world can apparently take a flying leap.
There is also the possibility that MSN is shutting down it's non-North American
chat rooms due to pressure from the omnipresent 'Department of Homeland
Security', i.e., if there are no 'jihad chat rooms' in Pakistan, it makes it a
little harder for terrorists to communicate online (or so the logic goes) but
they'll never admit that as a possible reason.
And MSN's shut down of chat rooms will do nothing to stop Yahoo and AOL from
picking up the slack, not to mention ICQ.
Unless they're "next"?
Yahoo and AOL were working with MS.
The MS Chat rooms that I went to a few times, many claimed to be 14,15 years
girls. It was bad. Many law enforcement people claimed to be 14 years old girls
too, from the crime news.
From Tandem, Canada -
http://www.tandemnews.com/viewstory.php?storyid=3207
Microsoft ends free MSN chatroom
The world-renowned service will now be discontinued in some areas and offered at a
fee in others
By Alessandro Cancian
Bill Gates swears to being totally extraneous to this, but the once-free MSN
chatrooms have now become credit-card operated entities. Too much spam and too many
risks for the minors were given as the reasons for closing down one of the MSN
services most popular among users. Although theoretically praiseworthy, this
decision leaves a strongly bitter aftertaste and a lot of questions. Microsoft
stated that, beginning October 14, 2003, the MSN Chat service will be discontinued
in the EMEA area (Europe), Asia, and Latin America, while it will remain available,
for a fee, in the United States, Canada, and Japan. The original service, active in
34 different countries, did not require any registration, and according to
Microsoft this was a problem, as it all but prevented identification of people
using the service.
Microsoft claims that this initiative is part of a series of measures, soon to be
announced, curbing "inappropriate uses of the Internet". In April Microsoft
launched, with Yahoo! and AOL, a joint global initiative tackling the problem of
spamming both on the side of technology, by developing safer communication
protocols, and on the side of society and law, by raising public awareness and
promoting specific laws.
In those areas where Microsoft has chosen to keep the chat service open, it will
require a payment (in the USA, and optionally in Canada and Japan) or, even if
still free, it will be moderated. In the former case the service will only be
available to people supplying MSN with credit card data, which would make it
simpler for Microsoft to identify transgressors and stop them right away. In the
latter, the chatrooms will be moderated by external partners who will avail
themselves of a combination of automatic control tools and human operators. As a
justification for the differences among countries, Microsoft claimed the need for
MSN to "comply with the different characteristics of the various markets, including
user behaviour and needs". The Redmond-based giant stressed that the closure of MSN
Chat will have no impact whatsoever on other communication services, such as MSN
Messenger, MSN Hotmail, and MSN Groups.
What's clear is that Microsoft has been focussing its resources on MS.NET Messenger
for some time now. By warning users of the need to update their MSN/Windows
Messenger clients to conform to a new version of the communication protocol, Gates'
company is actually pushing its users to migrate to an application claimed to
increase security and privacy... says Microsoft.
By reading between the lines, however, it becomes clear that Microsoft will be the
only clear winner.
Development of alternative clients will require signing a licence contract with
Microsoft for the future use of its instant messaging network. The reasons would be
costs and safety considerations. The fact is that, until not long ago, MSN was
doing the same to AOL, with MS trying and exploiting AOL's network for free.
Cheers and pleas for reconsideration has come from everywhere. Reactions range from
people liking the idea that this could somehow deter paedophiles from using these
channels to people seeing this as yet another attack on freedom of expression.
Everybody's intentions are honourable, but the doubt still lingers that this really
could hamper predators using the Internet for luring minors. Clearly, the
phenomenon will go underground, and this will make life more difficult for
investigators. Anyway, keep your credit card handy; it's the only document really
worth having.
***